TEST ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR-CN GUIDE & LEADER IN QUALIFICATION EXAMS & TEST ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR-CN SCORE REPORT

Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Guide & Leader in Qualification Exams & Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Score Report

Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Guide & Leader in Qualification Exams & Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Score Report

Blog Article

Tags: Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Guide, Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Score Report, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN New Study Notes, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Valid Exam Sims, Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Forum

Maybe most of people prefer to use the computer when they are study, but we have to admit that many people want to learn buy the paper, because they think that studying on the computer too much does harm to their eyes. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN test questions have the function of supporting printing in order to meet the need of customers. A good deal of researches has been made to figure out how to help different kinds of candidates to get PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) certification. We revise and update the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Torrent according to the changes of the syllabus and the latest developments in theory and practice.

As we all know that if we get a certificate for the exam, we will have more advantages in the job market. We have ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study guide for you to get the certificate quickly. Besides, we are pass guarantee, if you indeed fail the exam, we will be money back guarantee. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Study Guide of us obtain many good feedbacks from our customers. Free demo of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam dumps are provided by us, you can have a try before you buy them, so that you can know the mode of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning materials.

>> Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Guide <<

Best Way to Pass PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Certification Exam

If you are the first time to prepare the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam, it is better to choose a type of good study materials. After all, you cannot understand the test syllabus of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam in the whole round. It is important to predicate the tendency of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study materials if you want to easily pass the exam. And our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Questions are the one which can exactly cover the latest information of the exam in the first time for our professionals are good at this subject and you can totally rely on us.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Sample Questions (Q298-Q303):

NEW QUESTION # 298
場景 4：Branding 是一家行銷公司，與美國一些最著名的公司合作。降低內部成本。兩年多來，Branding 已將軟體開發和 IT 幫助台營運外包給 Techvology。技術學。配備必要的專業知識，管理品牌的軟體、網路和硬體需求。 Branding 已實施資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS) 並獲得了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證，表明其致力於維護高標準的資訊安全。它積極對技術進行審計，以確保其外包業務的安全性符合 ISO/IEC 27001 認證要求。
在上次審計期間。品牌的審計團隊定義了要審計的流程和審計計畫。他們採用了基於證據的方法，特別是考慮到 Techvology 在過去一年中報告的兩起資訊安全事件。所有方面。
此外，審計也對Techvology用於管理其外包業務和其他組織的治理流程進行了嚴格的評估。此步驟對於品牌推廣至關重要，可以驗證是否有適當的控制和監督機制來減輕與外包安排相關的潛在風險。
審計員對 Techvology 各級人員進行了採訪，並分析了事件解決記錄。此外，Techvology 還提供了記錄作為證據，證明他們為員工開展了事件管理意識會議。根據收集到的信息，他們預測這兩起資訊安全事件都是由人員不稱職造成的。因此，審計人員要求查看涉事員工的人事檔案，以審查其能力的證據，例如相關經驗、證書和參與培訓的記錄。
Branding 的審計員對所獲得的證據的有效性進行了嚴格評估，並對可能與收到的記錄資訊的可靠性相矛盾或質疑的證據保持警惕。在對 Techvology 進行審計期間，審計員堅持這種方法，嚴格評估事件解決記錄，並對不同級別和職能的員工進行徹底的訪談。他們不只把 Techvology 代表的話當作事實；相反，他們尋求具體的證據來支持代表們對事件管理流程的主張。
根據上述情景，回答以下問題：
審計人員是否認真遵守外包業務的審計流程？

  • A. 不，審計人員直到審計結束時才要求提供僱傭合約樣本
  • B. 是的，他們在審計實務中表現出了勤勉和判斷力
  • C. 不，審計人員在審計期間沒有採訪 Techvology 的任何高階管理人員

Answer: B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct Answer:
ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems) outlines diligent audit practices, including evidence-based assessment and professional skepticism.
The auditors critically reviewed records, interviewed staff, and validated incident response effectiveness.
They did not rely solely on verbal statements but sought concrete evidence, demonstrating due diligence and judgment.
B . Incorrect:
Employment contracts are not primary audit evidence for competence; training and certification records hold greater significance.
C . Incorrect:
The scenario does not mention that top management was excluded from interviews. However, their involvement is not mandatory for evaluating incident handling.
Relevant Standard Reference:


NEW QUESTION # 299
您正在 ABC Healthcare Services 的療養院執行 ISO 27001 ISMS 監督審核。 ABC 使用由供應商 WeCare 設計和維護的醫療保健行動應用程式來監控居民的健康狀況。在審核過程中，您了解到90%的居民家庭成員每週都會透過電子郵件和簡訊定期收到WeCare的醫療器材廣告。 ABC 與 WeCare 之間的服務協議禁止供應商使用居民的個人資料。美國廣播公司已收到許多居民及其家人的投訴。
服務經理表示，這些投訴作為資訊安全事件進行了調查，發現這些投訴是合理的。
已根據不合格和糾正措施管理程序規劃並實施糾正措施。
您寫了一份不合格項“ABC 未能遵守與居民及其家庭成員的個人資料相關的資訊安全控制 A.5.34（隱私和 PII 保護）。供應商 WeCare 使用居民的個人資訊向家庭成員。”從列出的糾正和糾正措施中選擇您希望 ABC 針對不合格項採取的三個選項。

  • A. ABC 對所有員工進行維護資訊安全協定重要性的訓練。
  • B. ABC 取消與 WeCare 的服務協定。
  • C. ABC 為所有供應商引入了資訊安全績效背景調查。
  • D. ABC 停止使用 ABC Healthcare 行動應用程式。
  • E. ABC 要求 ISMS 顧問測試 ABC Healthcare 行動應用程式以防範網路犯罪。
  • F. ABC 確認資訊安全控制 A.5.34 包含在適用性聲明 (SoA) 中。
  • G. ABC 對 WeCare 違反合約採取法律行動。
  • H. ABC 定期監控涉及第三方的所有適用法律和合約要求的遵守情況。

Answer: B,C,H

Explanation:
The three options of the corrections and corrective actions listed that you would expect ABC to make in response to the nonconformity are:
* B. ABC cancels the service agreement with WeCare.
* E. ABC introduces background checks on information security performance for all suppliers.
* F. ABC periodically monitors compliance with all applicable legislation and contractual requirements involving third parties.
* B. This option is a possible correction and corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. A correction is the action taken to eliminate a detected nonconformity, while a corrective action is the action taken to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent its recurrence1. By cancelling the service agreement with WeCare, ABC could stop the unauthorized use of residents' personal data and protect their privacy and rights. This could also prevent further complaints and legal issues from the residents and their family members. However, this option may also have some drawbacks, such as the loss of a service provider, the need to find an alternative solution, and the potential impact on the residents' well-being.
* E. This option is a possible corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. By introducing background checks on information security performance for all suppliers, ABC could ensure that they select and work with reliable and trustworthy partners who respect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information they handle. This could also help ABC to comply with information security control A.15.1.1 (Information security policy for supplier relationships), which requires the organisation to agree and document information security requirements for mitigating the risks associated with supplier access to the organisation's assets2.
* F. This option is a possible corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. By periodically monitoring compliance with all applicable legislation and contractual requirements involving third parties, ABC could verify that the suppliers are fulfilling their obligations and responsibilities regarding information security. This could also help ABC to comply with information security control A.18.1.1 (Identification of applicable legislation and contractual requirements), which requires the organisation to identify, document, and keep up to date the relevant legislative, regulatory, contractual, and other requirements to which the organisation is subject3.
References:
1: ISO 27000:2018 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Overview and vocabulary, clause 3.9 and 3.10 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology
- Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A, control A.
15.1.1 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A, control A.18.1.1


NEW QUESTION # 300
場景 8：苔絲
一個。 Malik 和 Michael 是一個由安全、合規以及業務規劃和策略領域的獨立且合格的專家組成的審計團隊。他們被指派到一家大型網頁設計公司Clastus進行認證審核。他們在進行審計時表現出了出色的職業道德，包括公正和客觀。這一次，Clastus 確信，如果獲得 ISO/IEC 27001 認證，他們將領先一步。
審計團隊負責人 Tessa 擁有審計專業知識，並且在 IT 相關問題、合規性和治理方面擁有非常成功的背景。馬利克擁有組織規劃和風險管理背景。他的專業知識依賴於對組織的安全控制及其風險承受能力的綜合和分析水平，以準確描述組織內部的風險水平 另一方面，Michael 是通過遵循嚴格的標準化程序進行控制評估的實際安全性的專家。
在執行所需的審計活動後，泰莎發起了一次審計團隊會議，他們分析了邁克爾的一項發現，以客觀、準確地就該問題做出決定。 Michael 遇到的問題是組織日常運作中的一個小問題，他認為這是由組織的一名 IT 技術人員造成的，因此，Tessa 會見了高層管理人員，並在他們詢問了責任人姓名後，告訴他們誰應該對這一問題負責，為了方便澄清和理解，Tessa 在審核的最後一天召開了結束會議。在這次會議上，她向 Clastus 管理層報告了​​發現的不符合情況。然而，Tessa 收到建議，避免在 Clastus 認證審核的審核報告中提供不必要的證據，確保報告保持簡潔並專注於關鍵發現。
根據審查的證據，審核小組起草了審核結論，並決定在授予認證之前必須對該組織的兩個領域進行審核。這些決定後來被提交給被審計方，但被審計方不接受調查結果並提議提供更多資訊。儘管受審計方提出了意見，但審計員已經決定接受認證建議，因此沒有接受補充資訊。被審計單位的高階主管堅持審計結論並不代表事實，但審計小組仍堅持他們的決定。
根據上述情景，回答以下問題：
誰主要負責審計報告的編制和內容？

  • A. 審計團隊成員
  • B. 認證機構
  • C. 審計團隊負責人

Answer: C

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct answer:
ISO 19011:2018 states that the audit team leader is responsible for compiling and finalizing the audit report.
B . Incorrect:
Team members contribute findings, but the leader ensures finalization.
C . Incorrect:
The certification body reviews but does not prepare the report.
Relevant Standard Reference:


NEW QUESTION # 301
審計結果是根據審計標準對收集的審計證據進行評估的結果。評估以下潛在的審計證據格式並選擇可接受的兩種。

  • A. 系統工程師的言論，無法驗證
  • B. IT 經理與系統工程師之間對話的錄音
  • C. 有關 IT 審核結果的記錄資訊
  • D. 觀察先前錄製的演示危險活動表現的視頻
  • E. 對測試結果進行未簽署的手寫更改
  • F. IT 經理的事實陳述

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam preparation guide1, audit evidence can be in various formats, such as records, statements of fact, or other information that is relevant and verifiable. Audit evidence can be collected by means of interviews, observation, sampling, testing, or other techniques. However, not all formats of audit evidence are acceptable or reliable. For example, unsigned hand written changes to test results (A) are not verifiable and may indicate tampering or falsification. Statements by a system engineer that cannot be verified (D) are also not reliable and may be biased or inaccurate. An audio recording of a dialog between the IT manager and a system engineer (F) may not be relevant to the audit criteria or may violate the confidentiality or consent of the parties involved. A statement of facts by the IT manager (B) may be relevant and verifiable, but it is not sufficient as audit evidence unless it is supported by other sources of information. Therefore, the two acceptable formats of audit evidence are documented information on results of IT audits and observation of a previously recorded video demonstrating the performance of a hazardous activity (E), as they are relevant to the audit criteria and can be verified by other means. Reference: 1: https://pecb.com/pdf/exam-preparation-guides/pecb-iso-iec-27001-lead-auditor-exam-preparation-guide.pdf (page 9)


NEW QUESTION # 302
您是 ISMS 審核小組組長，由您的認證機構指派對客戶進行後續審核。您正在為此審核準備審核計畫。
下列哪兩項敘述是正確的？

  • A. 應先驗證改進機會，然後再修正，最後採取糾正措施
  • B. 應先檢視糾正措施，然後是糾正，最後是改進機會
  • C. 驗證應重點關注所採取的任何行動是否有效
  • D. 驗證應專注於所採取的任何操作是否完成
  • E. 驗證應重點關注所採取的任何行動是否有效
  • F. 應先驗證糾正措施，然後是糾正措施，最後是改進機會

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 9.1.2, the organisation shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the information security management system conforms to the organisation's own requirements, the requirements of ISO 27001:2022, and is effectively implemented and maintained12 According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 10.1, the organisation shall react to the nonconformities and take action, as applicable, to control and correct them and deal with the consequences. The organisation shall also evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent recurrence or occurrence. The organisation shall implement any action needed, review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken, and make changes to the information security management system, if necessary12 A follow-up audit is a type of internal audit that is conducted after a previous audit to verify whether the nonconformities and corrective actions have been addressed and resolved, and whether the information security management system has been improved12 Therefore, the following statements are true for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken is complete. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has implemented all the planned actions to correct and prevent the nonconformities, and whether the actions have been documented and communicated as required12 Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken effectively. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has achieved the intended results and objectives of the actions, and whether the actions have eliminated or reduced the nonconformities and their causes and consequences12 The following statements are false for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken efficiently. This is false because efficiency is not a criterion for verifying the actions taken to address the nonconformities and corrective actions. Efficiency refers to the optimal use of resources to achieve the desired outcomes, but it is not a requirement of ISO 27001:2022. The auditor should focus on the effectiveness and completeness of the actions, not on the efficiency12 Corrections should be verified first, followed by corrective actions and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the corrections, corrective actions, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 Opportunities for improvement should be verified first, followed by corrections and finally corrective actions. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the opportunities for improvement, corrections, and corrective actions. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 Corrective actions should be reviewed first, followed by corrections and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for reviewing the corrective actions, corrections, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should review all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to review the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 Reference:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2


NEW QUESTION # 303
......

We can proudly say that our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions are global. So no matter what kinds of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN test torrent you may ask, our after sale service staffs will help you to solve your problems of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN practice braindump in the most professional way. Since our customers aiming to ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study tool is from different countries in the world, and there is definitely time difference among us, we will provide considerate online after-sale service on our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN training guide twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, please just feel free to contact with us anywhere at any time.

Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Score Report: https://www.testkingfree.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-practice-exam-dumps.html

There are three versions of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning materials: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) for now with high accuracy and high quality, If we do not want to attend retest and pay more exam cost, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam cram may be a good shortcut for us, Choosing our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN last study vce, you will never be regret, You become eligible for high-paying jobs and promotions in your current firm after earning the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) certification, If yes, getting the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions by TestKingFree is a perfect start to your PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) exam preparation.

Introduction to Active Server Pages, So I had a bunch of folks, There are three versions of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Learning Materials: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) for now with high accuracy and high quality.

If we do not want to attend retest and pay more exam cost, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam cram may be a good shortcut for us, Choosing our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN last study vce, you will never be regret.

Pass Guaranteed Quiz PECB - Newest Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Guide

You become eligible for high-paying jobs and promotions in your current firm after earning the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) certification, If yes, getting the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions by TestKingFree is a perfect start to your PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) exam preparation.

Report this page